Harris BCS Poll
For the fifth year in a row, Denny O'Brien is a member
of the voting panel
for the Harris Interactive College Football Poll
commissioned by the Bowl Championship Series. As a
service to readers of this site, O'Brien's ballot will
be published in this space each Monday throughout the
rest of the season.
A senior
columnist for Bonesville.net, Bonesville The Magazine
and The Pirates' Chest Magazine, O'Brien was nominated to the
Harris Poll panel by Conference USA. The
Harris Poll is a component of the BCS Standings.
View the panel
of 114 voters in the 2010 Harris
Interactive College Football Poll.
|
Denny O'Brien's Harris Poll Ballot
(Ballot cast
11.28.10)
1. Oregon
2. Auburn
3. Texas Christian
4. Stanford
5 .Wisconsin
6 .Ohio State
7. Arkansas
8. Boise State
9. Virginia Tech
10. Nebraska
11. Michigan State
12. Oklahoma
13. Louisiana State
14. Oklahoma State
15. Nevada
16. South Carolina
17. Alabama
18. Missouri
19. Texas A&M
20. Florida State
21. Northern Illinois
22. Utah
23. Mississippi State
24. Hawaii
25. Arizona
|
Week #7 BCS Standings |
Harris, AP, Coaches Polls |
|
|
|
By
Denny O'Brien
©2010 Bonesville.net
All Rights Reserved.
Maybe it’s time for East Carolina to
reconsider its scheduling philosophy. Given the Pirates’ recent
performance against non-conference opponents, perhaps they could benefit
from something more forgiving.
An annual guarantee game against
Campbell, Elon, Western Carolina, or William and Mary would provide a
welcome breather. So would a visit from a weak program from another BCS
non-Automatic Qualifier conference.
Both should provide a needed boost to
the overall record and increase the likelihood that ECU will attain the
goal of bowl eligibility. But that is unlikely to occur anytime soon
when glancing at the Pirates’ future football schedules.
ECU opens next season against rising SEC
power South Carolina in Charlotte, travels to Navy, and hosts North
Carolina and Virginia Tech. The Pirates will be underdogs in each of
those match-ups, and a 0-4 finish in non-conference play is certainly
conceivable.
Should that occur, ECU would have to
finish 6-2 in Conference USA just to become bowl eligible. And 6-6
hardly guarantees a postseason trip.
There is no question that athletics
director Terry Holland’s scheduling strategy has succeeded in
consistently filling Dowdy-Ficklen Stadium. The attendance numbers and
atmosphere at home games are evidence of that, and both were in need of
significant boosts after John Thompson’s
dismissal in 2004.
The fact that Dowdy-Ficklen Stadium now
seats 50,000 has also increased the necessity for having an attractive
home schedule. But you have to think that could be accomplished without
overloading the non-conference schedule.
No doubt, the Pirates would benefit from
having at least one regional BCS AQ opponent on the home slate.
Likewise, they’d also benefit from having a couple of gimme games that
would enable Pirates coach Ruffin McNeill to build depth by getting
players who aren’t on the two-deep chart into games.
That isn’t much of an option in the
current scheduling setup.
Clearly Boise State and Texas Christian
have gotten more mileage nationally out of consistently bludgeoning
patsies than ECU has with the occasional win over N.C. State, Virginia
Tech, or West Virginia. While those victories are long remembered by
Pirates fans, they aren’t lasting memories for those outside of ECU
circles.
At the end of the day, a 10-2 record
against an assortment of cupcakes looks better than 8-4 or 7-5 against a
more imposing schedule. At least that is typically the case for non-AQ
schools.
There is no doubt that ECU, at least
while it is a member of C-USA, needs the presence of one BCS AQ opponent
on the annual home schedule. To accomplish that, it means the Pirates
likely would have to play one on the road as well.
That leaves room for a couple of
lightweights on the slate. Though ECU’s non-conference schedules are
booked for several more years, the Pirates could benefit from having
them tweaked.
Mixing it up
After being heavily criticized for his
defense surrendering 62 points to Rice, East Carolina defensive
coordinator Brian Mitchell deserves credit for at least trying a few
wrinkles against Southern Methodist.
The Pirates showed a lot of two- and
three-man defensive fronts, as well as nickel and dime packages. That
was especially popular on third downs, though it ultimately proved
unsuccessful.
The Mustangs finished the day an
impressive 12 of 17 on third downs, and many of those opportunities were
converted in long yardage situations. SMU quarterback Kyle Padron, who
at times struggled with his accuracy, was at his best on third and long.
Perhaps that is because the Pirates were
unable to apply any pressure, while the secondary struggled in man
coverage. It makes you wonder why ECU doesn’t play more zone,
considering how successful it was during consecutive C-USA championship
runs.
The Mustangs
nosed past the Pirates in overtime 45-38.
Fans must answer the call
Though bowl invitations have yet to be
sent, the Pirates are now assured of a bid somewhere thanks to Texas
Tech. The Red Raiders’ victory over Houston kept the Cougars from
reaching bowl eligibility, leaving six C-USA teams available for six
slots.
Much of the speculation is around the
Pirates heading to the nation’s capital for the Military Bowl. The D.C.
game, which is played on December 29 against an ACC opponent, sent two
officials to the Pirates’ game against SMU Friday.
They cited ECU’s regional appeal and
reputation for traveling well as reasons it was an attractive option.
If the Pirates do get the bid to D.C.,
the pressure is on for fans to respond. With the game well within
driving distance (it could even be done as a day trip), after Christmas,
and against a recognizable opponent, there is no reason why this bowl
shouldn’t be well attended by ECU.
With the Big East looking to add to its
football membership, it is critical that East Carolina, should it get an
invitation to D.C., sell more than its allotted tickets. This is a clear
case where Pirates fans must live up to their reputation.