Harris Poll
For the seventh year in a row, columnist Denny O'Brien is a member
of the voting panel
for the Harris Interactive College Football Poll
commissioned by the Bowl Championship Series. O'Brien was nominated to the panel by Conference USA.
His weekly ballot will
be published in this space each Monday throughout the
rest of the season.
The
Harris Poll is a component of the BCS Standings. O'Brien's
ballot below was filed in conjunction with this week's Harris Poll. |
Denny O'Brien's Harris Poll Ballot
(Ballot
filed
11.25.12;
ECU
opponents and current
and incoming Conference USA
teams highlighted in yellow.)
1. Notre Dame
2. Alabama
3. Georgia
4. Oregon
5. Florida
6. LSU
7. Kansas State
8. Texas A&M
9. Stanford
10. South Carolina
11. Oklahoma
12. Florida State
13. Nebraska
14. Clemson
15. Oregon State
16. UCLA
17. Northwestern
18. Utah State
19. Boise State
20. Northern Illinois
21. Michigan
22. Kent State
23. Vanderbilt
24. Louisville
25. San Jose State |
|
Weekly BCS
Standings |
Weekly
Voters' Polls |
|
|
By
Denny O'Brien
©2012 Bonesville.net
All Rights Reserved.
View the Mobile Alpha version of this page.
In a game filled with offensive standouts, it should be
difficult to select the breakout star from
East Carolina’s 65-59 double overtime victory
over Marshall Friday. Exactly how do you select one guy in a game that
eclipsed 100 points and 1,000 yards?
Pirates quarterback Shane Carden was certainly worthy
after a 439-yard passing effort that included three touchdowns through
the air and three more on the ground. His effort was simply one of the
best we’ve ever witnessed by any quarterback in Dowdy-Ficklen Stadium.
Marshall starting QB Rakeem Cato was equally impressive.
Despite missing much of the second half with both knee and ankle
injuries, he registered 318 yards passing and five scores. The Herd
hurler more than demonstrated why he is among the nations’ most prolific
passers.
But if you had to pick one star from Friday’s shootout,
it wouldn’t be either of the guys throwing the passes. Rather, it would
be the one who caught a bushel of them. Pirates receiver Justin Hardy
was the best player on the field.
Article continues below
the following picture.
Justin Hardy (2) in action against Houston
earlier this month. [Photo: W.A. Myatt]
Hardy
quickly is establishing himself as one of the best receivers in ECU
history, if not the best ever.
By the time regulation ended early Friday evening, Hardy
had corralled 16 balls for 171 yards. Even more impressive was the
timing of his catches, several of which occurred at critical moments
during the Pirates’ overtime-forcing drive.
His 19-yard catch on 4th and 10 kept the 46,000-plus who
attended from exiting. Two plays later he added a 16-yard reception,
only to one-up himself with an acrobatic 19-yard snare on the very next
play.
It provided the perfect punctuation to Hardy’s
career-to-date.
“He was just being his normal self,” Carden said of
Hardy’s performance. “He’s a great playmaker. If you just give him the
ball, he’s going to make plays. He’s got good hands. I think they
(Marshall) just lost track of him, and he made some great plays for us
tonight.”
Just like he’s done throughout his 1,000-yard season.
Given his sophomore status, it should be unfair to
compare Hardy to other ECU receiving greats, especially considering who
is included among that group.
There’s former Pirates and current Dallas Cowboys
receiver Dwayne Harris, arguably the best all-around player in program
history. There’s Lance Lewis, Aundrae Allison, Terrance Copper, Larry
Shannon, Troy Smith and Hunter Gallimore, along with several others.
Each made a significant impact on the ECU program and can
be found atop various categories in its record books. But each one of
those records is subject to shattering with Hardy on the field.
Not the most imposing physically, Hardy is as good a
route runner as you will find, and his hands are second to none. And
while not an Olympic sprinter, he has more than enough speed to run away
from defenders.
Even more impressive is the fact that Hardy has two years
remaining at ECU. That has to be a frustrating proposition for the
defensive coordinators who must construct defensive plans to contain
him.
Because if you had to choose one receiver in ECU history
to headline the Pirates’ offense over the next two seasons, it would be
difficult to select someone other than Hardy.
Different
perspectives
On one hand, East Carolina is an 8-4 football operation
that included an impressive 7-1 mark in Conference USA. On the other,
the Pirates didn’t beat a team with a winning record outside of
FCS opponent Appalachian State.
Both are accurate measurements of how the Pirates fared
during the regular season.
Ultimately your perspective on the season depends on
where you focus. Is it on the Pirates’ record or the competition that
helped produce it?
“Wins are hard,” Pirates Coach Ruffin McNeill said. “I’m
proud of us winning. To get eight was big. We wanted eight. Now we want
nine or ten.
"I
thought finishing 7-1 in the conference was big. I felt good about the
kids accomplishing that.”
When you look at the overall body of work,
Navy was the only loss in which
there was a noticeable talent advantage for ECU, and the criticisms that
followed that performance were fair. Given the Pirates’ talent, there
certainly was something that could have been done schematically to
better contain the triple option.
The Pirates’ other three losses were largely the result
of better personnel for the opposition. That’s not to say that talent
gaps can’t be overcome with Xs and Os, especially considering ECU’s
history of doing so.
Even so, to dismiss an eight-win season because of the
competition isn’t fair to the coaches and players. Regardless of how
good or bad C-USA is, this was only the second time the Pirates finished
with a 7-1 league record.
That should count for something.
4th down call
Had East Carolina lost Friday, the most debatable
coaching call would have been the decision to go for it on 4th and 1
from midfield with just over two minutes remaining in the first half.
The Pirates were leading 35-21 at the time, and could
have pinned the Herd deep with a punt and potentially preserved a
two-score lead heading into intermission. On the flip side, had ECU
converted, it could have punctuated the half with another score and
carried a 21-point cushion into the locker room.
Instead, the Pirates were stuffed and surrendered a
momentum-shifting touchdown.
“I was trying to win the game,” McNeill said. “I was
trying to win the championship. My experience is, when you have a chance
to get into a championship game, I say go for it.
"I
felt we could make it with Cooper running. They did a good job of
stacking it up. You always ask yourself ‘What if?’ Not me. I felt good
about being able to make it.”
No doubt, the higher percentage move would have been to
punt, thus the outcry that understandably followed. But had ECU gotten a
yard against one of the nation’s worst rushing defenses, McNeill would
have been applauded for the call.