Harris BCS Poll
For the sixth year in a row, columnist Denny O'Brien is a member
of the voting panel
for the Harris Interactive College Football Poll
commissioned by the Bowl Championship Series. O'Brien was nominated to the panel by Conference USA.
The
Harris Poll is a component of the BCS Standings. O'Brien's
ballot below was filed in conjunction with this week's
final 2011 Harris BCS Poll.
|
Denny O'Brien's Harris Poll Ballot
[Ballot
cast
12.04.11]
(Conference USA
teams and ECU opponents highlighted in yellow.)
1. LSU
2. Oklahoma State
3. Alabama
4. Oregon
5. Stanford
6. Boise State
7. Arkansas
8. South Carolina
9. Kansas State
10. Wisconsin
11. Georgia
12. Baylor
13. Texas Christian
14. Michigan State
15. Michigan
16. Clemson
17. Nebraska
18. Virginia
Tech
19. Southern
Miss
20. Oklahoma
21. Penn State
22. Houston
23. West Virginia
24. Notre Dame
25. Florida State
|
Final BCS
Standings |
Harris/AP/Coaches Polls |
|
|
|
|
C-USA Standings |
(Through games of 12.03.11) |
Conference USA record reflects
regular season games only |
|
East
Division |
SCHOOL |
C-USA |
ALL |
USM
Marshall
ECU
UAB
UCF
Memphis |
6-2
5-3
4-4
3-5
3-5
1-7 |
11-2
6-6
5-7
3-9
5-7
2-10 |
|
West
Division |
SCHOOL |
C-USA |
ALL |
Houston
Tulsa
SMU
Rice
UTEP
Tulane |
8-0
7-1
5-3
3-5
2-6
1-7 |
12-1
8-4
7-5
4-8
5-7
2-11 |
|
|
|
By
Denny O'Brien
©2011 Bonesville.net
All Rights Reserved.
Maybe the Big East
will eventually announce its replacements for the schools that
successfully escaped it. That moderately anticipated announcement was
supposed to occur several weeks ago, only to get 86’d by the scandal at
Penn State.
Big East football
hardly registers nationally to begin with, and developments in State
College would have shoved any mention of expansion to the back page of
any sports daily.
Then it was
supposed to happen a couple of weeks ago, once all the red tape with
existing television contracts was cut through. Obviously the Big East
wasn’t expecting to get BY-Used in the process.
So here we sit
today with no official news on the Big East’s future plans. Only a
six-pack of mediocre pigskin programs remains, with speculation of the
programs that will join it. Included within that bunch are current
Conference USA members Central Florida, Houston, and Southern Methodist,
along with Mountain West delegates Air Force, Boise State, and San Diego
State.
It’s perplexing
that only one of those schools is in the eastern time zone.
If the Bowl
Championship Series were to keep its current system in place, hopping a
jet from San Diego to New Jersey makes perfect sense. The lure of AQ
status within the current postseason structure would more than
compensate for any financial hardship that might accompany cross-country
travel.
But if Houston and
friends are banking on the Big East — or anyone — maintaining AQ status,
they are taking a short-sighted approach. It’s clear from the most
recent BCS meetings that major change is on the horizon, and the
elimination of AQ status could be the next route taken.
Should that occur,
and many believe it will, what then for Houston and SMU? Will the
television contract the Big East negotiates provide the necessary
compensation for those schools to send their women’s volleyball teams to
the Northeast several times per year?
And without AQ
status, what’s the draw for Boise State to leave one league of perceived
misfits for another? Especially when further exploration into the new
merger between C-USA and the Mountain West could ultimately lead to more
bowl and television revenue.
Considering
Central Florida’s geographic location and rival South Florida’s
existence in the Big East, it makes perfect sense for the Knights to
accept an invitation. That’s not the case for most of the other schools
being discussed.
For the
non-eastern time zone schools, joining the Big East does not provide a
decided competitive upgrade from their current conference scenarios.
More importantly, there is no guarantee that a move will provide a
better bottom line.
The
case for Oklahoma State
The thought of a
rematch between LSU and Alabama had no influence on
my final Harris Poll ballot.
Truthfully, my eyes would welcome another game between the Tigers and
Crimson Tide.
There were,
however, many factors that led me to push the Cowboys ahead of the Tide
in the final rankings. The most important was the overall number of
quality wins.
Oklahoma State
embarrassed both Baylor (my No. 12) and Oklahoma (my No. 19) this year,
while also beating Kansas State (my No. 9). The Cowboys also registered
solid road victories over Tulsa, Texas A&M, Texas, and Missouri.
Comparatively,
Alabama had convincing victories over Arkansas (my No. 7) and Penn State
(my No. 21). But its other conference wins weren’t nearly as impressive
as Oklahoma State’s, and the Tide also has a win over a Football
Championship Series opponent on its resume.
There is no
question that Oklahoma State has the worst loss between the two, losing
at Iowa State in double overtime. But in the end, I valued the overall
number of quality wins more heavily, along with the fact that the
Cowboys won one of the nation’s most challenging conferences, while
Alabama didn’t even win its own division.
Given that
criteria, Oklahoma State was more deserving.
Back
to bowling
There is no
indication that East Carolina coach Ruffin McNeill is on the hot seat,
but it’s clear given the volume of openings that athletics directors
lack the patience that was reflected in the job 20 years ago.
They can’t afford
to.
When programs
don’t win, donors aren’t nearly as generous with their checkbooks or
attendance. Television executives and regional media also lose interest
when teams lose more than they win.
And it’s
ultimately up to the AD to address those issues.
With East Carolina
finishing 5-7, the Pirates ended a streak of five consecutive bowl
appearances, a run that included two straight C-USA championships and
Liberty Bowl berths. Missing the postseason naturally caused some unrest
within the masses, and the mere thought of extending that to consecutive
seasons could potentially cause an uproar.
Given the
navigable C-USA slate and East Carolina’s competitive and financial
position within the conference pecking order, it’s reasonable for fans,
at a minimum, to expect the Pirates to conclude each season with a bowl.
The number of ECU
returnees compared to the personnel losses of its conference rivals
suggests the Pirates could again contend for the C-USA crown next fall.
With a lighter non-conference load, the Pirates should, at a minimum,
return to a bowl.
That should keep
McNeill’s status relatively secure.