By
Denny O'Brien
©2008 Bonesville.net
All Rights Reserved.
O'Brien on Harris Poll voting panel
For the third year in a row, Denny O'Brien is a member
of the voting panel
for the Harris Interactive College Football Poll,
commissioned by the Bowl Championship Series. As a
service to readers of this site, O'Brien's ballot will
be published in this space each Monday throughout the
season.
The
Harris Poll is a component of the BCS Standings. This
season's first Harris poll will be released on Sept. 28.
The first 2008 BCS Standings, which also take into
account the USA Today Coaches Poll and an average of six
computer service rankings, will be released on Oct. 19.
A senior
columnist for Bonesville.net, Bonesville Magazine and
The Pirates' Chest, O'Brien was nominated to the Harris
Poll panel by Conference USA. View a list of the
Harris Poll panel members
on this week's national polls page. |
THIS WEEK'S POLLS |
|
BONESVILLE THE MAGAZINE |
|
ON
SALE NOW |
|
|
|
There are many reasons for
East Carolina’s rapid ascension into the national polls this season.
The defense, for starters, has improved to the point where it no longer
is the program punch line. The worst outing to date — the 384 yards the
Pirates surrendered to N.C. State Saturday — would be considered a good day
over most of the past two decades.
In the process, the offense has hardly slipped, if not improved. The
Pirates are probably even more diverse with their effective mix of the
spread and old-fashioned power football.
But if you want to identify one reason for the Pirates’ rise from
obscurity to national relevance, it would have to be the top man under
the headset. Head coach Skip Holtz has changed the culture at East
Carolina, restoring the pride of the school’s glory days and raising the
ceiling to heights that many believed was beyond the Pirates’ reach.
However, that hasn’t placed a shield of critical immunity around the
Pirates’ fourth-year coach. In the wake of No. 23 ECU’s painful loss to
rival N.C. State, most of the second-guessing from Saturday centers on
his decision to go for the TD on fourth down from the one yard line.
Had the Pirates kicked the
field goal then, some rationalize that it, along with the field goal Ben
Hartman nailed later, would have given them a ten-point cushion. But
there is absolutely no guarantee that ECU would have driven the ball
deep enough into field goal range a second time.
Consider this: The reason East Carolina drove into scoring range the
second time was because of the field position advantage it gained from
not converting deep in Wolfpack territory.
ECU’s inability to kick it deep
— and its shortcomings in kick coverage
— were just a couple of factors that went into Holtz’s thinking.
“If you watched our
kickoff team, (State) would have started off much better than that,”
Holtz said. “I don’t regret it.
“I turned to Greg Hudson and I said, ‘What do you think?’ He said, ‘Go
ahead, let’s get up two scores now.’ So we turned and we went after it.
We played this game to win. I didn’t play it conservative or close to
the vest, and I wouldn’t change anything that I did. I might change a
couple of play calls since they didn’t work, but I would go for it
again.”
And it would be the right call, again.
If anything is to be criticized about that play, it is its execution.
Had the fullback executed his block on J.C. Neal, the Pirates are
probably sitting a perfect 4-0.
“It was a base play,” Holtz said. “It was a play that we run out of our
goal line package quite a bit.
“I know that the offensive coaches were talking to those guys to find
out what happened. I don’t know. The guy who never turned around and
asked the quarterback, was the guy who missed the block.”
Holtz deserves credit for positioning East Carolina to nail the door
shut early in the fourth quarter. He shouldn’t be criticized for his
team’s inability to do so.
Missing Cotton, Bryant
Much attention has been given to State’s injury list, which is long
enough to keep the team doctors busy until Christmas.
But of all the players missing in action Saturday, there were few more
significant than Quentin Cotton and Stanley Bryant.
“Quentin Cotton is a very talented player,” Holtz said. “And I’m not
going to say that we’re a better defense without him. We’re a much
better defense with him.
“I thought that Nick Johnson went in there and did some good things.
Melvin Patterson got a chance to play a little bit at linebacker as
well. But we are not as good without Quentin. No. But that didn’t lose
it for us. I’m certainly not going to lean on that, because I know that
N.C. State has had some injuries as well.”
Holtz is right in not pinning ECU’s loss on the absence of Cotton. The
Pirates had several chances to close the door on the Wolfpack in the
fourth quarter.
Even so, Cotton is the heartbeat of the ECU defense and its emotional
leader. His presence in the huddle during the Wolfpack’s final drives in
regulation and overtime might have provided a needed lift.
Ditto for Stanley Bryant. His absence was felt during the Pirates’
overtime possession when quarterback Patrick Pinkney was sacked and
fumbled.
Perhaps Bryant’s quickness at left tackle could have prevented Shea
McKeen from blind-siding Pinkney.
Unsportsmanlike conduct
Some questioned AD Terry Holland for the measures he suggested regarding
fan sportsmanship at ECU athletics events. Specifically, he requested
that ECU’s fans welcome — not boo — opponents as they enter and exit the
field at Dowdy-Ficklen Stadium.
Anyone standing in the tunnel as the Pirates exited Carter-Finley
Stadium should understand why.
The verbal berating ECU’s players took from the State student section
was one that would do West Virginia fans proud. A downpour of expletives
and back alley invitations showered the humbled Pirates all the way to
the locker room.
You really have to question why some fans reduce themselves to low-class
heckling in lieu of celebrating the valiant effort of their underdog
team. It shows poor taste and a lack of appreciation of a game that was
well-fought and will be remembered as one of the best in the series
history.
To be fair, the Pirates weren’t exactly the model of sportsmanship when
they took the field. Several entertained themselves by taunting fans in
the opposite end zone with the Wolfpack hand signal.
That definitely should be addressed. But so should the behavior of the
students who crudely attacked the Pirates with their coarse verbal
barrage.
Surely, this is not a complete reflection of
the Wolfpack Nation. Every
school has fans that are the exception to a first-class operation, and
ECU certainly is not immune.
At the same time, you have to admire the steps Holland has taken to
improve the relations between ECU’s fans and its opponents. It’s another
example of why Holland is one of the most respected leaders in college
athletics.