By
Denny O'Brien
©2013 Bonesville.net
All Rights Reserved.
View the Mobile Alpha version of this page.
My first reaction to East Carolina’s decision to use a
large search committee to identify the school’s next athletics director
wasn’t a good one.
Truthfully, that position hasn’t changed.
Anytime a school assembles an oversized group of
individuals to guide critical hiring decisions, individual agendas have
more potential to interfere with the process. That naturally can lead to
contentious discussions that ultimately culminate with the selection of
a compromise candidate that appeases all sides.
We’ve seen it before at ECU. But hopefully not again.
East Carolina’s best bet would have been to leverage the
expertise of an external consulting firm to do the majority of heavy
lifting — and at least there is some indication that Chuck Neinas and
Todd Turner have some degree of involvement — and then use a small
committee for interviews.
Regardless, ECU will land a good athletics CEO as long as
the following criteria are considered:
• Ability to identify and hire coaches: This easily is
the most important trait of an ECU AD, especially as it pertains to the
direction of the Pirates’ football program. East Carolina football, when
prosperous, has the capability to sell itself with very little marketing
around it.
With ECU’s pending move to the Big East, the Pirates’
next AD will need to quickly evaluate the football program and take
decisive actions on the long-term status of the coaching staff. A good
season next fall should lead to an extension for Pirates head coach
Ruffin McNeill, while any backsliding would naturally need to prompt
further evaluation.
By far, Terry Holland’s best moves while at East Carolina
were the quick decision to fire John Thompson after only two seasons as
football coach and then select Skip Holtz as his replacement. Those
actions led to the surprisingly quick restoration of the Pirates’
program.
An athletics department is only as good as its head
coaches, especially as it pertains to those guiding the revenue
producing programs. East Carolina needs a whiz at this.
• Ability to think outside the box: This is largely what
has defined Holland’s tenure at ECU. He often sought new ways to
navigate the Pirates’ waters, refusing to accept the status quo.
This was especially true when it came to non-conference
football scheduling and East Carolina’s conference future.
No doubt, part of the resurgent interest in ECU football
was Holland’s aggressive scheduling philosophy, in which he struck
home-and-home agreements with numerous regional opponents. That led to
ECU establishing records in season ticket sales on numerous occasions.
Holland also kept his eye on the Pirates’ conference
future — which included outlining several possibilities within the
changing landscape — while always seeking methods to improve the present
scenario. He was by far the most outspoken of Conference USA’s ADs,
which led to needed changes in conference scheduling to alleviate some
of the travel burdens.
• Comprehensive Rolodex: East Carolina won’t be able to
replace Holland’s national clout, but at the very least it needs an
individual with numerous strategic contacts within the industry.
Unlike neighboring rivals, ECU can’t sell itself
nationally on name alone. While it isn’t exactly a national unknown, it
also isn’t within the name brand category of the nation’s all-sports
giants.
Holland’s widespread contacts landed home-and-home series
for ECU that generated desirable television time slots. It also landed
East Carolina’s name in the press anytime a national writer needed a
quote on the direction and impact of conference expansion.
Some drop off should be expected here. But East Carolina
can’t afford an AD who has to start over.
• Corporate fundraiser: At some point, the money fountain
of some of ECU’s most generous donors will dry up. At last check, they
aren’t getting any younger.
That means the ability to expand the number of donors and
the overall amount they contribute is an absolute must. When you
consider the number of fans who attend football games, the overall
percentage of them that are donors is relatively low.
So opportunity for growth is there.
Given the financial gap between the automatic access
conferences and those that lack it, ECU athletics won’t be prosperous on
individual contributions alone.
East Carolina’s next AD must increase the school’s
corporate reach. The best-case scenario — even if it is a difficult one
to achieve – would be to find corporate sponsors willing to contribute
enough to rename each of the Pirates’ major athletics venues.
Wake Forest did this in football. UNC-Charlotte has done
it in other sports. East Carolina needs an AD who can do it for all its
venues.