|
BCS deliberations in flux as deadline looms
By The Associated Press
PONTE VEDRA BEACH, FL — With a
few weeks left to make a decision that will shape the future of college
football, Bowl Championship Series officials are narrowing their options for
adding a fifth game to their multimillion-dollar package.
BCS chairman Mike Tranghese
said opinions among the six major BCS conferences and the bowls are changing
frequently between models that would add a week to the season and those that
would simply add a fifth game and leave the structure relatively unchanged.
"I couldn't handicap it,"
Tranghese said Tuesday in an interview with The Associated Press. "I could
tell you exactly what everyone's position was of last week, and I could tell
you that I think a lot of positions are changing. They've got to go back,
got to study it, got to talk to their membership."
What Tranghese does know is
that models involving adding a week to the season are still meeting
resistance from school presidents.
"I think it depends on how
much value we can extract out of the models," Tranghese said. "TV wants a
playoff. They've been told `No.' Absent that, they want a plus-one."
ABC paid $525 million to
televise the BCS for seven years, ending with the 2005 season.
The fifth game is being added
to give schools from smaller conferences a better chance to make the BCS.
Under one model, the
championship game would pit the first and second-ranked teams in the BCS
standings at the end of the regular season in a second game at the site of
one of the current BCS bowls, the Fiesta, Rose, Orange or Sugar.
Another model, considered by
some the one favored by TV but least likely to pass, would take Nos. 1 vs. 2
after the first four BCS games were played and pit them in a title game the
next week in the fifth bowl.
The biggest advantage of a
championship game a week later is that it would create a Super Bowl-like
week of hype and would stand alone as the biggest college game of the year.
The disadvantage is that it
would diminish the games being played the week before, especially if one
were being played at the site of the title game, which presumably would get
the least-attractive teams of the eight to play during BCS week.
The logistics of the plans are
still be worked out, but Tranghese said the Rose would likely only be
interested if it could keep its traditional Pac-10 vs. Big Ten game in the
three years it doesn't serve as host of the title game, unless those teams
are ranked first or second.
"I think that characterizes
their position," Tranghese said. "Where we end up is another thing."
The other option would be
simply to add a fifth game and rotate the title game among the five, which
is how the system works now with four bowls. Nine bowls are in the running
for a fifth game.
"It's a process," Gator Bowl
executive Rick Catlett told the Florida Times-Union. "They indicated they
have a lot of work to do before their final decision and we're going to be
patient and supply the BCS with any information or help they need."
Although BCS officials don't
begin negotiating their new contract until September, the Rose Bowl starts
talking with the Big Ten and Pac-10 in June, and that's the deadline the BCS
has set for deciding on how to handle the fifth game. The fifth game will
start for the 2006 season, the first year of the new BCS contract.
Tranghese insisted that nobody
feels rushed.
"I think the deadline's a
positive," Tranghese said. "I think in our heart of hearts, we know we have
to make a decision, I think we're going to be ready to make it and I think
if we didn't have the deadline, we'd sit here and regurgitate it for three
or four months and I don't know what's left to regurgitate."
Also in June, the BCS will
unveil a new, simpler formula for determining the No. 1 vs. No. 2 matchup.
In three of the past four years, there have been at least three teams with
legitimate claims to spots in the title game.
It has been widely reported
that the new formula will drop several aspects, like strength of schedule
and number of losses, and focus solely on the AP poll, the coaches' poll and
the computers. Tranghese wouldn't confirm that, but did say that a simpler
formula has been decided upon and is being worked over by mathematicians "to
make sure that what we think it is, it is."
The goal, he said, was to make
it easier to understand.
"We're trying to take all the
elements, put them together in a more simplified way, with some adjustments,
so the public can understand," he said. "The public doesn't want the
minutiae, and we understand that."
Copyright 2004
The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
02/23/2007 10:40:23 AM
|
