Editor's note:
This is the second article in a two-part examination by
senior columnist Denny O'Brien of the dynamics that will
influence Big East Conference decision makers as competitive
factors and market forces prod them to consider league
expansion. In
part one, published on
June 11,
2007, O'Brien speculated that emerging opportunities will
present compelling reasons for the Big East to add one or
more schools to its roster. |
©2007 Bonesville.net
All Rights Reserved.
If you read anything into
the rhetoric from a few influential Big East figures, it's easy to
conclude that the league eventually will increase its football
membership.
While the presiding
question might be when (not if) expansion will occur, the criteria, how
many and exactly who aren't far behind. And those answers aren't easily
identified.
Comprehensive comparisons,
bean counting, and mudslinging politics are certain to play their part.
School presidents are sure to entertain marketing pitches and phone
calls from AD's and governors from along the East Coast.
But in the race for seats
at the BCS buffet, PowerPoints and videos don't earn a spot at the
table. Too much is at stake for the Big East to pursue hypothesized
glitz over proven pedigree.
That's why Commissioner
Mike Tranghese and his trusty disciples must strategically pinpoint the
fitting criteria and fine tune the details within it before arriving at
their choices.
Market first and foremost
should drive any league's expansion direction. But that doesn't mean
that the equation can be oversimplified by size.
The Southeastern
Conference has one of the most lucrative television contracts in all of
college football, and is filled mostly by schools from smaller markets.
Its success on the field no doubt is the primary reason for the hefty TV
revenue, but residing in a region where college football reigns supreme
also ups the price.
Adding a city in which the
majority of its residents lack interest see Central Florida just
doesn't make sense. What's good in adding sets when the local viewers
are firmly focused on Florida, Florida State, Miami, and Mickey Mouse?
A market's value also
should extend further than its television impact. The importance of
adding uncharted recruiting waters can't be overstated.
Culture is perhaps the
most overlooked denominator in any expansion process. If that weren't
the case, Virginia Tech would have been the ACC's first choice not the
conditional candidate that made the league's expansion desires possible.
The Big East should seek
schools with cultures that rival Virginia Tech when it joined the league
years ago. Back then the Hokies were an upstart program that hadn't
quite maximized its potential.
Big East membership more
than provided the incubator for the Hokies to fully emerge, and programs
with Tech-like credentials a proud tradition, fans who travel, and
abundant television exposure have plenty of appeal.
Problem is, most of those
schools already have security in a BCS sanctuary. But that doesn't meant
there aren't viable candidates from non-BCS leagues who boast some or
all of those desirable qualifications.
Here's a crash course look
at four who should top the Big East's list:
East Carolina resembles
the old Virginia Tech more than any candidate on the list. The Pirates
possess the most intriguing football culture, one defined by a solid
history of success and a die hard constituency that is a favorite among
bowl officials.
ECU's longstanding
philosophy on scheduling boldly offers extensive opportunities for TV
appearances beyond any league's guaranteed package. In most years, that
could equate to exposure that doesn't count against the Big East's
negotiated quota.
Market size no doubt could
be viewed as the Achilles' heel, but that's only if conference officials
rely solely on those
misleading Nielsen numbers. By adding ECU, you're
essentially adding a state in which college sports reign supreme and
the only school within it where football is king.
North Carolina and
Tidewater Virginia also offer underexploited recruiting potential. Not
to mention that the region makes a nice bridge between the Big East's
northeastern roots and its Florida extension.
Memphis is a major
metropolitan area and the Tigers (the Volunteers aside) are the big game
in town. Despite the presence of an NBA franchise, the local university
grabs the headlines and attention of most local sports fans.
Tennessee to the core is a
football culture and Memphis is drenched with potential. The possibility
of a new stadium and close proximity to both Arkansas and Mississippi
make for expansive opportunities along the recruiting front.
Though Memphis has zero
appearances in the Liberty Bowl, the university and the game have an
outstanding relationship. It's no stretch to suggest that Lady Liberty
could follow Memphis.
Army and Navy provide
the perfect package deal. Both are national programs with wide-ranging
interest and built-in bowl affiliations that could be added to the Big
East's postseason package.
But perhaps no addition is
more attractive than the annual game between the Black Knights and
Midshipmen. Few regular season match-ups compare to that Civil War, and
its eventual inclusion in the Big East TV lineup automatically drives
the network bidders higher.
And though location
doesn't matter nearly as much as it once did, there's something to be
said about fitting firmly within the league's geographic footprint.
Of course many will
suggest that increasing the Big East's football membership to 12 won't
add much if anything to each school's financial coffers. In the end,
that might be the case.
But creative marketing and
shrewd negotiating could generate enough cash flow to more than
compensate for the additional mouths to feed. That places the planning
and preparation stages of the selection process at a premium.